Home
Predatory Lending
Construction Defects
Misrepresentations
Lawsuits & Other Actions
HOME ENGINEERING Where Quality Counts and Honesty Matters
  

Investigations since May 2006 have yielded several predatory lending schemes orchestrated by DHI Mortgage and parent company D R Horton. Hundreds of defrauded consumers have already been located and their information forwarded to state and federal enforcement agencies. Very briefly, some of the frauds are:
1. Acceptance of substantial money deposits, fraudulent claims of consumer default, money deposits forfeited and contracts cancelled.
2. Locking in an interest rate, unlocking it and then raising the interest rate at signing.
3. Substantially underestimating closing costs, sometimes applying their promised "incentives" towards those costs, then nearly always charging substantial end fees.
4. Requiring application through DHI, and when you notify them that you prefer an outside lender, they accelerate closing, make it impossible for your lender to perform, and then pressure you to close with DHI on their timetable or forfeit all deposits and cancel the contract.
5. Delaying closing, and charging the consumer interest as a late closing penalty.

6. Inflated and deceptive origination fees.

7. Not including required HUD closing documentation in consumers' files which would tip them off to misapplied 'credits' or unapplied 'incentives.' 

8. Promising that credit challenged consumers will get approved for a loan, cashing in their deposits, and then informing them that they cant get the loan but have instead forfeited their money.

9. Promising credit challenged consumers that they will get approved for a loan, which they do through a "buyer's club" which miraculously increases FICO scores, for homes which they cant afford and will ultimately default on.

10. Including the costs of illusory 'incentives' into the base price of the home so that the consumer doesn't actually get any benefit from using DHI Mortgage.  In fact, DHI rates are at most times substantially higher than other lenders, which is a detriment to the buyer.

Of course, out of state, or limited english proficiency consumers seem to be preferred for this kind of treatment.

26 State Attorneys General, HUD, DOJ, FTC, Board of Governors, SEC, Congress and other government entities have been informed and several have initiated investigations. The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of Horton's corporate policies have been outlawed for at least fifty years in some cases.

My own application through DHI Mortgage went like this:
I applied for and was approved for my DHI loan after 28 verified communications. I notified DHI that I preferred Wells Fargo. D R Horton and DHI would not sign documents, forwarded three wrong sales totals to Wells Fargo, caused the closing to be delayed beyond the escrow date, and threatened to cancel the contract and keep my deposits because I couldn't get my lender to perform.

I have been threatened with scores of libel suits, but never with follow through. I am inviting a lawsuit, but non is forthcoming. Why is that? Surely a $11B company can spend a little additional money and hire another dozen attorneys to sue me for posting lies and contacting the national media. Perhaps the reason is that none of the postings are lies. Truth is an ultimate defense.
Birds of a feather.....
D R Horton has hired the two ethically challenged outside defense law firms of Wood Smith Henning and Berman in Las Vegas and Wendel Rosen Black and Dean in California to formerly 'facilitate' and currently mishandle corporate affairs. Outside attorneys Odou, Ross and Marquez are of like mind and have also breached their respective ethical canons and professional standards. Both outside lawfirms are as inept as their two in-house teams of lawyers headed by David Jennings and David T. Morice. What had been a relatively minor dispute has grown into a variety of free-for-all multi million dollar consumer class actions. The founder Donald Horton and CEO Donald Tomnitz will likely have to come out of retirement and from under the rocks for this one because instead of settling morally and ethically in August 2006 for pennies, the Board has probably cost the shareholders tens, if not hundreds of millions in stock valuation.